Monday, May 30, 2011

funny faces for facebook

funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook.
  • funny faces for facebook.



  • Macnoviz
    Oct 3, 01:48 PM
    In other news, the pope today announced that he is Catholic. He also confesses to **** in the woods.

    No really, I expect quite a number of those things, but then at the end one more thing that nobody expects, not a phone, not another iPod, but something radically different. Just like the games at the last Stevenote, only bigger, something that will make you go Huh? :eek: Wtf ? :confused: Wow ! :) Now where's that credit card? :D





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook. Funny Face Book Tags,
  • funny faces for facebook. Funny Face Book Tags,



  • eric_n_dfw
    Oct 28, 06:16 PM
    Apple doesn't sell operating systems for profit, they sell HARDWARE.

    Yep. And you can tell when Apple is selling software for profit like any of the Final Cut Suite app's. Not only do they require a HUGE key to be entered at install/first run, it also locks it with unique info to the machine where it was installed. (Just try migrating a Final Cut Pro installation from one machine to another.)





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook.
  • funny faces for facebook.



  • TheSlush
    Apr 15, 01:17 PM
    Kind of inspired by... ? LOL

    http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/09/zune_back.jpg





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook. Making funnymaking funny lol
  • funny faces for facebook. Making funnymaking funny lol



  • Cassie
    Jan 12, 12:44 AM
    i totally agree with you. "aint that just cool?" "probably the best photo management program in the world".

    Those are not smug, those are facts!

    In case you can't tell, I'm serious.



    more...


    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook.
  • funny faces for facebook.



  • WestonHarvey1
    Apr 29, 02:19 PM
    I have to laugh at the people worried that one day Apple will cut off software access in OS X. Apple said they won't do that. That would be bad for business. It makes no sense.

    Steve Jobs' "PC is a truck" analogy was perfect. What these people aren't getting is that most computer users aren't nerds and hackers, but they've been forced to drive trucks all these years when they'd really be a lot happier with a Honda Civic.

    PCs are to be used for tasks a nerdy kid would get beat up for talking about in school. That's the test I use. Everything else is better suited to the post-PC world.

    And if you can make the PCs friendlier by adding post-PC features for the less technical tasks, what's wrong with that? It's a better experience for non-techies that have to use PCs for one reason or another, and who ever said hackers don't want to use nicer consumer-level software?





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook.
  • funny faces for facebook.



  • Pressure
    Oct 19, 10:23 AM
    Aye, international numbers would be good to see.

    Good news for Apple :)



    more...


    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook.
  • funny faces for facebook.



  • MacsAttack
    Jan 12, 07:00 PM
    Actually, I believe it wasn't released at MacWorld for two reasons...

    1) Time. They keynote ran about 2 hours as is (already above the average). Introducing two new software suites would easily add another 45 minutes (making the event much too long).

    2) The focus was clearly the iPhone, and Jobs didn't want anything to steal its glory.

    It makes much more sense to introduce the iPhone at MacWorld and have a separate event for Leopard, iLife, and iWork.

    MacWorld

    Mac World

    But we got no Macs

    And both items are pitched at he US market - not the world market (need to get movie downloads onto other iTunes stores for the Apple TV to be a compelling product)

    Oh - and I don't own a mobile phone and have no intention of getting one. Just a rat hole for suckers to pour money down :D

    Have not watched the keynote. Not going to bother.

    I'd like to see a bit more commitment from Apple (the company previously known as Apple Computers) on the computer side before I consider recomending any kind of Mac to people again.





    funny faces for facebook. The Faces - Funny Faces
  • The Faces - Funny Faces



  • partyBoy
    Apr 7, 08:51 PM
    - New faucets for bathroom & kitchen
    - 2 tickets for "Insidious"...do yourself a favor, go and watch it... I havent been scared like that since Saw...it is scary as hell :eek:



    more...


    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook.
  • funny faces for facebook.



  • llahsram
    Oct 17, 10:25 AM
    Blu-ray had initially gained a lot of studio support, but recently Universal Studios has decided to drop initial support for Blu-ray (http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,2017527,00.asp).

    This is false. Blu-Ray initially had less studio support. Universal never supported Blu-Ray (which the linked article states, despite the misleading headline), and Warner Brothers and Paramount only added support for Blu-Ray comparatively recently; they were initially HD-DVD only. Universal is now the only studio without Blu-Ray support.

    On the other hand, Fox and Disney are still supporting only Blu-Ray (though there have been rumors of Disney looking at HD-DVD). So for the time being, it's Blu-Ray for Star Wars and Pixar fans -- assuming this is still the state of affairs when the studios release those titles...

    Picture quality should be the deciding factor, and much like VHS vs Betamax, most people apparently can't see any real difference between BluRay and HD-DVD.

    Given the same quality decoding hardware, for most movies they shouldn't see any difference at all. Both support the same codecs (MPEG-2, h.264, and VC-1). The first Blu-Ray discs were encoded using MPEG-2, which produced a lower quality image than the VC-1-encoded HD-DVD discs, but newer Blu-Ray discs are using VC-1 as well. The picture should be identical between the two.

    The only case I could see where the capacity would affect it would be for longer movies like Lord of the Rings, where the encoded video plus lossless audio may reach the boundaries of HD-DVD. We could conceivably see more compression artifacts or the dropping of higher-resolution audio or commentaries on HD-DVD in these cases, whereas Blu-Ray would have more space. But this shouldn't affect most titles.





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook. funny-wedding-boy-men-face-
  • funny faces for facebook. funny-wedding-boy-men-face-



  • Rsquare.OB
    Oct 6, 10:51 AM
    First, Apple must build an iPhone that will work on Verizon's CDMA network (iPhone is GSM & HPDA), OR Verizon must upgrade their network to handle GSM/HDMA. I don't thing either will ever happen.



    more...


    funny faces for facebook. Send this Funny Photo
  • Send this Funny Photo



  • sparkso
    Mar 29, 02:05 AM
    great stuff,
    what had the prizes been like in previous years?





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook. Pike Powers#39;s funny face. Pike Powers#39;s funny face. Object-X. Nov 3, 12:41 PM
  • funny faces for facebook. Pike Powers#39;s funny face. Pike Powers#39;s funny face. Object-X. Nov 3, 12:41 PM



  • jrtc27
    Apr 30, 03:45 AM
    No, because then as pointed out by your MS friend, it would be Windows NT 6.1 ;) Your blog post even says it doesn't make sense, so I don't see how "MS gave you info" when your "source" says it doesn't make any sense.

    The reason why it is 6.1 is to maintain compatibility with software/drivers that worked in Vista - they did not want another Vista moment!

    I don't get why everybody hates this UI change - I personally think it looks a lot better and people will not get confused:).



    more...


    funny faces for facebook. Funny Faces In Hanoi
  • Funny Faces In Hanoi



  • Music-Man
    Jan 9, 03:22 PM
    Come on.
    I dont think I can hold out much longer.
    I'll give Apple til 8.30 Aussie time. ie another 10 mins.





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook. funny face. funny face. Mr. Anderson. Jul 22, 08:04 PM. wow, that#39;s totall nuts - who#39;d a thought, non-expo overload.
  • funny faces for facebook. funny face. funny face. Mr. Anderson. Jul 22, 08:04 PM. wow, that#39;s totall nuts - who#39;d a thought, non-expo overload.



  • AnonMac50
    Apr 30, 03:56 AM
    major kernel version

    1,2: 1.0 and 2.0
    3: 3.0, WfW3.11, NT 3.51
    4: 95, 98, NT4
    5: 2000, XP
    6: Vista
    7: Windows 7 (but really 6.1):confused:

    So the answer is, "marketing"

    That's not the reason if I remember. They started count at 3 as 1 & 2 were "not real Windows". It was 3, 95, 98, ME, XP, Vista, 7; or something like that. It is kernel 6.1 because they didn't want the incompatibility problems of jumping a large kernel version (ie XP 5.1 to Vista 6.0). But yes, it mostly is marketing.



    more...


    funny faces for facebook. Mike Rowe Funny Faces
  • Mike Rowe Funny Faces



  • mrw00tastic
    Apr 25, 12:43 PM
    If that is a guy holding that phone he needs to cut those nails...Damn hippy!





    funny faces for facebook. Share your funny faces with
  • Share your funny faces with



  • jhedges3
    Oct 3, 11:23 PM
    I don�t care as much about the Mac Phone any more. We�ve been talking about it for years. And with the exceptions of some phones that can play a song or two or three there has been nothing of the sort. Are we really supposed be filled with glee about an ipod that gets signal?

    The level of interest on MR about the Phone (and many other things, new wireless, video pods, etc.) is clearly a reflection of consumer want for advancements in function and form. But again and again Apple never fully addresses these wants.

    People on MR were probably buying into the early generations of the ipod. And although there were other mobile media devices that preceded them the ipods seemed like something different. That was October 2001 though. What has happened since? We�ve purchased other ones, which had more storage and different colors, but were the same thing. Do any of you see an end to this any time soon? Do you think the 6G and 7G will be anything but a little bigger and a little brighter? I know you want it to be, but will it be?

    And this pattern goes for most of their other devices. Are the current Mac Book Pros much different than say a PowerBook G4 from several years ago? What functionality does the current MBP have that a PB doesn�t or can�t?

    That�s only the positive side. The old PBs got crazy hot on your thighs. The new ones do the same. The next will do the same. The old batteries got terrible life after a few months of use. The new ones will be the same way.

    Perhaps they have to sell to a broader base now, perhaps their focus is in large part on getting new people, converts. If that�s as true as it has seemed for a while now I�m ready for an Apple 2 to come. The idea wouldn�t be to supplant them. Apple 1 would be better than they are now at selling to the former Compaq buyers of the world. Apple 2 would give everyone on MR everything they want as soon as they want it.



    more...


    funny faces for facebook. Funny Faces Face Painting
  • Funny Faces Face Painting



  • rdowns
    Apr 23, 01:15 PM
    The rating system looks ugly and out of place and just adds clutter to the forums.


    Much like the logo in your avatar. :p





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook. Me Making A Funny Face - Funny; Me Making A Funny Face - Funny. Blue Velvet. Nov 28, 01:22 PM. Honestly, why does M$ keeps trying
  • funny faces for facebook. Me Making A Funny Face - Funny; Me Making A Funny Face - Funny. Blue Velvet. Nov 28, 01:22 PM. Honestly, why does M$ keeps trying



  • Stella
    Mar 28, 09:26 PM
    What I don't get is why wouldn't any developer want to distribute through the MacApp store? Unless they make a vertical market product (like my company and we would never use any mass-market distribution channel) I can't see why a developer wouldn't?


    Because their application doesn't conform to apple's Mac AppStore rules. There may be very good reasons why an application cannot be modified to comply.

    Even Apple break their own Mac Appstore rules! ( i.e., XCode ).





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook. funny facesome funny face; funny facesome funny face. wrldwzrd89. Oct 20, 07:24 PM. Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U;
  • funny faces for facebook. funny facesome funny face; funny facesome funny face. wrldwzrd89. Oct 20, 07:24 PM. Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U;



  • ECUpirate44
    May 2, 09:29 AM
    No thanks.





    Yakuza
    Apr 16, 03:04 AM
    I want My next iPhone to look like this,

    222383

    Probably it will be

    Whether its a 3D render, photoshop, from Mars or Venus, my money is on that kind of version of the next iphone.

    I truly believe we will see an iphone with alu back, following the line with the iPad. I would buy one :D:D:D

    btw, in the 3rd photo you can see some light entering in the silence botton hole :rolleyes:





    ucfgrad93
    Mar 17, 01:14 AM
    Haaaaaaa just shared a launch day story, and the majority of you would have hauled ass with iPad in hand for the price I paid. Haters lmfao

    No, I wouldn't have. Unlike you, I don't enjoy ripping people off.





    Macky-Mac
    May 5, 04:15 PM
    ..... the point is we don't need the damn government getting involved and telling doctors what they can and can't ask. Or for that matter telling doctors who they must and who they musn't provide care for. It's a private transaction between the customer and the physician, so leave it at that....

    in reality though, the government is deeply involved in licensing and regulating the practice of medicine. It does so to protect the public from harm by quacks, malpractice, fraud and criminal behavior.

    And when it comes to hot button issues, abortion as an example, state governments do indeed tell doctors they have to say and do certain things.




    DoFoT9
    Aug 14, 08:09 PM
    well i added 2 more GPUs to my folding mix. i got a gtx 465 folding in the same rig as a gtx 260. it took awhile, but finally have them both folding with the gpu3 client. we'll see how it does

    2 more :eek: farout man! how do you afford all that hahaha!





    tvguru
    Sep 12, 07:40 AM
    Does this mean we won't be seeing iTunes 7.0? I mean if they were releasing a new iTunes wouldn't they make the changes on the new release?

    They would have to update the store to handle it as well. I would assume that there will be a new iTunes out today also and that the movie portion of the store wouldn't be backwards compatible.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment