Tuesday, June 14, 2011

hayden panettiere vs megan fox

images hayden panettiere hayden panettiere vs megan fox. Angelina Jolie vs Hayden
  • Angelina Jolie vs Hayden



  • GotGC??
    01-22 12:52 PM
    Those numbers would be correct as of 2nd half of 2004, I think. I got it from a Labor Cert discussion thread (from immigrationportal.com) around that time.

    like the url of the site you read it at? I am wondering when those numbers were published -- i mean which year they were published? was there any mention of how many applications are still pending at bec?





    wallpaper Angelina Jolie vs Hayden hayden panettiere vs megan fox. Round 94/ Hayden Panettiere vs
  • Round 94/ Hayden Panettiere vs



  • amalshe
    08-24 03:23 PM
    Hi guys,

    I know J Barrett has been a star of this forum for a while.

    I just wanted to check if anyone in a similar situation as mine as received any update on their 485.

    140 approved from TSC in May 2006; LUD on 7/28
    485 received at NSC on July 2, 2007
    485 received and Signed for by J Barrett at 10:25 AM

    Thanks.





    hayden panettiere vs megan fox. hayden panettiere vs megan fox
  • hayden panettiere vs megan fox



  • manderson
    11-05 02:19 PM
    and i thought i was alone...

    Friends,

    Looking at this 180 rule. I feel getting through this 180 days is being hell.

    All this becuase we need freedom and going through rough times.

    Good luck to one and all.





    2011 Round 94/ Hayden Panettiere vs hayden panettiere vs megan fox. megan fox 2011 golden globes
  • megan fox 2011 golden globes



  • mk6
    07-17 07:05 PM
    Thanks for your list. So it seems we can do it without attorney help. I am not sure what my attorney is doing its been a month since he had all the papers and fee. I am going to try filing myself:mad:



    more...


    hayden panettiere vs megan fox. Hayden Panettiere vs.
  • Hayden Panettiere vs.



  • kiran_k02
    01-12 12:58 AM
    If your application is excessively delayed, you can always enter using a valid AP. Gurus correct me if I am wrong.

    Masterji, I will not be able to come on AP as my Passport is in Application Package.





    hayden panettiere vs megan fox. Hayden Panettiere vs Megan Fox - Page 2 - F13: The Community
  • Hayden Panettiere vs Megan Fox - Page 2 - F13: The Community



  • Alabaman
    07-11 05:03 PM
    I am not making fun of anybody... I didnt write that. I dont even know the rep in question. Thats from ilw.com. Immigrations lawyers or something like that. This is more like a press article I am bringing to your attention.



    more...


    hayden panettiere vs megan fox. Re: Hayden Panettiere vs Megan Fox
  • Re: Hayden Panettiere vs Megan Fox



  • pappu
    01-27 02:03 PM
    We recd. our 485 approval last week and recd. the cards in the mail earlier this week. We were interviewed at the local USCIS for our 485's, 2 weeks ago. It went really smooth and case was approved the same day as the interview.

    I would like to whole-heartedly thank IV core and all IV members. This site has been an amazing resource of information & support for us thru our journey. I became a IV member during the July 2007 fiasco. We were there at the IV rally in DC in Sept 2007, have attended local chapter meetings. We will continue to support IV in it's mission.

    Thanks everybody.!

    EB-II (India)
    PD - April 2006
    Filed 485 (spouse & myself) - July 2007
    485 Approved / Cards recd - January 2011.

    Congrats.
    After Greencard, you can actually do a lot more to help this community. We are looking for such GC holder people within IV that are interested in political advocacy. If you would like to get active contact IV.





    2010 hayden panettiere vs megan fox hayden panettiere vs megan fox. hayden panettiere
  • hayden panettiere



  • greenguru
    06-30 12:03 PM
    Well Said, EB3 retro.

    My job title is Software Engineer, can i join another company with a different job titile.


    Cheers



    more...


    hayden panettiere vs megan fox. Hayden Panettiere and Jessica
  • Hayden Panettiere and Jessica



  • amsgc
    09-10 12:08 AM
    You should request your new employer to do Premium Processing on your H-1B petition.
    You will get a response from USCIS in 2 weeks and you will know for sure whether it has been approved/rejected or if USCIS needs more evidence. If it is approved, you will also know whether it was approved with Change of status (i.e. I94 attached), or whether you are required to leave the country and re-enter on a H-1B visa.
    If new evidence needs to be submitted, then you will get a response within two weeks of submitting additional evidence.

    The fee for Premium processing is $1000. Note that the beneficiary of the petition (you in this case) is legally allowed to pay the fee for premium processing. But, only the petitioner (your future employer) can file the application for Premium processing.

    As far as I know - you are considered in a period of authorized stay as long as your petition for change of status/extension of stay is pending with the USCIS. You will begin to accrue unlawful presence from the day the petition is denied, if that were to happen.

    The lawyers on this forum can advise you better.

    i don't know what to do right now.i stayed over april 2009 which is the end of my i-94 because i have a pending petition of immigrant as a nurse.And my lawyer said i am allowed to stay until october 2009. But now the problem is I was filed as H1b by another employer so is it possible that they will approve me here?My lawyer said that when i received already the notice of receipt i can stay here while waiting for the approval.And when my approval comes with 1-94 on it i don't have to leave the US but when it has been approved without i-94 i will leave the US for consular processing asap and re-enter here as h1 status.HELP i really don't know what to believe anymore!at the moment i am waiting for my notice of receipt in h1b visa.I only have until oct to get a result for the approval!please advice me what is the best I can do!THANKS:)





    hair megan fox 2011 golden globes hayden panettiere vs megan fox. pictures hayden panettiere vs
  • pictures hayden panettiere vs



  • zuhail
    10-30 02:02 PM
    I completely disagree with what gc_on_demand is saying.
    Even as recently as this week, Congress has passed some immigration provisions that has been added to other major bills and Obama has signed them into law. I do not believe that Hispanic Caucus is simply blocking every immigration legislation until CIR- that's just BS.

    Based on the statistics published by USCIS,
    MurthyDotCom : USCIS Shares Useful Info in Pending I-485 Charts (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_pndchr.html)

    http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/New%20Structure/3rd%20Level%20(Left%20Nav%20Children)/Green%20Card%20-%203rd%20Level/Pending%20Form%20I485%20Reports.pdf

    I think passing this bill help will definitely help the EB2 category which would consequently make more visa numbers available for EB3 category.
    I believe that IV should start a dedicated fund raising movement for lobbying efforts to help pass this bill.
    Sri.



    more...


    hayden panettiere vs megan fox. Megan-Fox-in-underwear.jpg
  • Megan-Fox-in-underwear.jpg



  • vikki76
    09-18 03:12 PM
    Take infopass, go with your welcome notice, get 551 stamp - it will allow you to travel until you get the physical card. Usually, 551 stamp is valid 1 year from the date of stamping.

    I know some people who have traveled using 551 stamp in the past. They had to go through secondary inspection, carried all their docs with them, but everything went fine.





    hot Hayden Panettiere vs. hayden panettiere vs megan fox. hayden panettiere vs megan fox
  • hayden panettiere vs megan fox



  • logiclife
    05-30 03:04 PM
    As of May 30, 2006, our total contributions stand at $ 137,616.10.

    IV team would like to thank all the contributors who have shown a great deal of passion and commitment to this cause and helped us achieve the goal of reaching 130K by Memorial Day.

    We are extremely pleased with the enthusiasm of our membership. Almost 30% of our members have contributed funds at some point.
    Our contributions not only help us fund the public advocacy and professional help we receive from Quinn-Gillespie, it also represents the strength and commitment of the people who constitute this organization. The amount of funds we get is also a measure of the amount of frustration faced by nearly half a million legal high-skills immigrants who are victims of a broken system. It is also a measure of the strength and resolve of people who want to stand up to an unfair system and fight it.

    We thank all our contributors for showing a firm resolve and participating in this effort.

    "Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any one thing."
    Abraham Lincoln (1809 - 1865)


    http://www.rowleycorvette.com/cards/misc0011.jpg



    more...


    house megan fox makeup ideas. look hayden panettiere vs megan fox. megan fox tattoos rib. megan
  • megan fox tattoos rib. megan



  • greyhair
    06-21 09:31 AM
    In 2001, Congress passed a bill called American Competitiveness for 21st Century. This bill recaptured all unused/wasted green cards between 1992 to 2000. These recaptured green card numbers were suppose to be applied for EB by distributing them from 2001 to 2005. As the result starting 2001 you see higher than 140K green cards numbers allocated. However, those additional green cards which were suppose to be applied starting 2001 were wasted, in addition to the green card numbers in 2006 and 2007. Also, my understanding of the law is that if in an year, green number is not utilized in FB, in the last quarter of the year that green card visa number could flow to EB . Likewise, if a green card number is not utilized in EB, in the last quarter the unused green card could flow to FB.

    I read on this forum that starting 2001 (after the unused visa numbers were captured the last time) the total of these unused/wasted green card numbers from EB + FB is around 316K. Hope this clarifies your question.

    But don't count on any new law to recapture green card visas outside of CIR. It is not going to happen. IV core team said that the administration, and both Republican and Democratic lawmakers are opposed to do anything outside of CIR.

    Here is today's news in Politico indicating the same thing -
    Jon Kyl: Obama holding border 'hostage' - Andy Barr - POLITICO.com (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0610/38789.html)

    If Administration can tie high profile subject such as border security with CIR, is there any chance that lawmakers will let Recapture through (outside of CIR)? I don't think so.



    I have often heard about visa recapture in these forums, and always that there were lost visa numbers. I came across a DHS site yesterday with statstics on GCs issued, and must admit I am a bit confused about what visa recapture means. The site is DHS | Yearbook of Immigration Statistics: 2009 (http://www.dhs.gov/files/statistics/publications/LPR09.shtm) . Looking at table 6 (Persons Obtaining Legal Permanent Resident Status by Type and Major Class of Admission: Fiscal Years 2000 to 2009), we get the following data on EB and FB issuances.

    Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total
    FB 235,092 231,699 186,880 158,796 214,355 212,970 222,229 194,900 227,761 211,859 2,096,541
    EB 106,642 178,702 173,814 81,727 155,330 246,877 159,081 162,176 166,511 144,034 1,574,894
    Total 341,734 410,401 360,694 240,523 369,685 459,847 381,310 357,076 394,272 355,893 3,671,435


    if we we were to take deltas from the fb cap of 226k and eb cap of 140k, the scenario looks as follows, where a -ive number indicates over allocation.

    Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total
    FB -9,092 -5,699 39,120 67,204 11,645 13,030 3,771 31,100 -1,761 14,141 163,459
    EB 33,358 -38,702 -33,814 58,273 -15,330 -106,877 -19,081 -22,176 -26,511 -4,034 -174,894
    Total 24,266 -44,401 5,306 125,477 -3,685 -93,847 -15,310 8,924 -28,272 10,107 -11,435

    As we can see, cumulatively from 2000-09, 11,435 more visas have been given than actually permitted. Particularly in EB 174k excess visas were given.

    I'm curious to know, what recapture means, when it seems visas have not been lost.

    The only case for recapture is if we only count the years visas were under allocated, and ignore the years it was overallocated. The scenario would look as follows

    Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total
    FB 0 0 39,120 67,204 11,645 13,030 3,771 31,100 0 14,141 180,011
    EB 33,358 0 0 58,273 0 0 0 0 0 0 91,631
    Total 33,358 0 39,120 125,477 11,645 13,030 3,771 31,100 0 14,141 271,642

    So are we trying to recapture 271k visas from this calculation?

    If the experts could shed some light on this, that would be great.





    tattoo Hayden Panettiere vs Megan Fox - Page 2 - F13: The Community hayden panettiere vs megan fox. i cant decide. hayden cuz im a sucker for blondes but megan fox
  • i cant decide. hayden cuz im a sucker for blondes but megan fox



  • pointlesswait
    03-31 11:30 PM
    Dude,

    I think one of the reasons why you got and RFE is because u filed for a transfer without sufficient paystubs. You need atleast 3-4 (bi weekly) paystubs to not raise any eyebrows.
    So basically the IO officer was doing his thing and requesting all the basic documentation.

    best scenarios would have been : If you had gone back to company A after a gap of few months, and filed for an extension and then transferred to Company B, this RFE would not have risen at all ...as you would have have continuous employment and pay stubs to show.

    In this economy everyone has got hit pretty hard..so just hope for the best.



    Thanks a lot for your comments. They are really helpful.

    In case I do what you mention, what normally comes with a rejection? would the USCIS go further (beyond the simple denial), and rule that I was out status penalizing/prohibiting me to enter the country?

    Should it be better if I just leave the country and wait for the approval outside the US? I guess Im prepared for a denial, what concerns me the most is jeopardizing B1-B2 Visa or as you said to be prohibited to enter the country.

    Do you know the "standard" wording for USCIS decision in cases like mine?

    Thanks a lot again, I really appreciate your comments.



    more...


    pictures Re: Hayden Panettiere vs Megan Fox hayden panettiere vs megan fox. Hayden Panettiere (the
  • Hayden Panettiere (the



  • mantagon
    01-14 09:40 AM
    I had applied for an extension for my parents, just a month before their I-94 was about to end. According to the law (as per my attorney, forums, Internet), they could stay here legally until a decision is made, which may be past the I-94 expiration.

    So, in your case, if the decision is Positive, then they can stay until the new I-94 date that USCIS gives them. However, if the decision is Negative, then they have 30 days from the date of the decision to leave the country without being deported.

    Hope this helps...





    dresses hayden panettiere vs megan fox hayden panettiere vs megan fox. Panettiere vs. Megan Fox
  • Panettiere vs. Megan Fox



  • chris
    10-18 08:22 AM
    Hi Kitiara,
    Ive had a look at your animation, and Ive got the size down roughly another 2k.

    What I did was I opened up the animation in fireworks and exported/optimised each layer, then I reopened each image and put them back on the canvas which I then trimmed to match your layers.

    What you could try is to only use photoshop for the image work and apply the text from fireworks, I'm not sure if this would make much of a difference but it might reduce it a further couple of k.:bandit:



    more...


    makeup Hayden Panettiere and Jessica hayden panettiere vs megan fox. megan fox makeup ideas. look
  • megan fox makeup ideas. look



  • krishnam70
    02-17 06:59 PM
    PD: October 2, 2002
    Country: India
    First Labor: EB3 (approved in May 2006)
    First I-140 approved: July 2006
    Second Labor: EB2 (filed in June 2007 and approved in December 07)
    Second I-140: Filed in January 2008 requesting retention of priority date
    I-485: Filed in April 2008
    Second I-140 approved in August 2008 with incorrect priority date
    Contacted AILA in December 2008 because priority date was incorrect on second approved I-140.
    USCIS email on February 9.

    Enjoy

    - kris





    girlfriend i cant decide. hayden cuz im a sucker for blondes but megan fox hayden panettiere vs megan fox. megan fox skinny. megan fox
  • megan fox skinny. megan fox



  • Blog Feeds
    04-26 11:30 AM
    AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:



    All eyes are on Governor Jan Brewer today.

    On her desk is SB 1070, an anti-immigrant bill which would effectively make all Latinos the target of arrest or interrogation, whether or not they are U.S. citizens, lawful immigrants, or undocumented foreign nationals. Indeed, such a hate-motivated bill may well compel all Latinos to pack up and leave the state. Brewer's choice is clear to anyone who cherishes freedom and democracy�veto SB 1070, and toss it into the dust bin of history where it belongs, together with Jim Crow, the Nazi Nuremberg laws, and South African Apartheid.

    But, believe it or not, the Governor is actually considering signing this venomous bill into law. Last night, in yet another surreal Arizona moment Governor Brewer addressed the 41st annual Chicanos Por La Causa anniversary dinner amid calls in the audience for her to veto SB 1070 and surrounded by protesters that chanted and marched outside the Sheraton Phoenix Downtown Hotel where the dinner was held. At the dinner, organization board chairwoman Erica Gonzalez-Melendez urged Brewer to veto "the most hateful piece of legislation directed at Latinos" aptly pointing out that SB 1070 will do nothing to fix our broken immigration system and only "panders to the racist fear mongers of our state." But, Governor Brewer refused to say what she would do, invoking political-speak instead, "I am not prepared to announce a decision on Senate Bill 1070," she said. "What I decide will be based on what's right for Arizona." http://bit.ly/96KJlT. (Note to reader: there have been several surreal moments in Arizona this week. On Monday Senator John McCain, who once described himself as a "maverick" and champion of comprehensive immigration reform, told Fox News host Bill O'Reilly that "the drivers of cars with illegals in it ... are intentionally causing accidents on the freeway." Then on Tuesday an Arizona state House committee approved a measure which would force President Obama to show his birth certificate if he runs for re-election. http://huff.to/9bfpzg)

    What is right for Arizona is for Governor Brewer to jealously protect the rights of all its citizens and follow the U.S. Constitution, not turn Arizona into the Fourth Reich. Let's be frank, by passing SB 1070 lawmakers have sold out Arizona taxpayers in a cynical effort to garner votes and look tough. The bill does nothing to build a functional immigration system, secure the border nor rid the state of dangerous criminals. Nor does it protect the wages and working conditions of US workers. Instead, it targets day laborers and ordinary citizens whose appearance might raise "reasonable suspicion" of unlawful immigration status in the mind of a police officer. If Governor Brewer signs SB 1070, people in Arizona with foreign sounding accents or who don't "look American" had better not run into the wrong cop (or even the right cop) because the law mandates they prove they are here legally.

    SB 1070 is not the product thoughtful policy making; it is hate speech masquerading as legislation. This sounds extreme until you read SB 1070 which is a hodgepodge of mean spirited provisions that will effectively transform Arizona into a police state for anyone whose skin is a shade other than white. The bill's effect may very well be to make Arizona "Latino Free" and force those who stay behind�U.S. citizens included�to feel like hunted criminals. Frankly, there is no other way to describe SB 1070 which would make not having immigration documents a state crime, allow law enforcement officers to arrest anyone who could not immediately prove they were in the U.S. legally, and subject a brown-skinned person who leaves home without a wallet to arrest. Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles was hardly exaggerating when he compared SB 1070 to "German Nazi and Russian Communist techniques whereby people are required to turn one another in to the authorities on any suspicion of documentation." http://bit.ly/9ZIQ9K.

    SB 1070's outright decimation of civil liberties and American values aside, Governor Brewer's signature on the bill will likely reek economic devastation on Arizona, costing its taxpayers billions in lost revenue. The Immigration Policy Center (IPC) reported this week that "if significant numbers of immigrants and Latinos are actually persuaded to leave the state because of this new law, they will take their tax dollars, businesses, and purchasing power with them. The University of Arizona's Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy estimates that the total economic output attributable to Arizona's immigrant workers was $44 billion in 2004, which sustained roughly 400,000 full-time jobs. Furthermore, over 35,000 businesses in Arizona are Latino-owned and had sales and receipts of $4.3 billion and employed 39,363 people in 2002, the last year for which data is available. The Perryman Group estimates that if all unauthorized immigrants were removed from Arizona, the state would lose $26.4 billion in economic activity, $11.7 billion in gross state product, and approximately 140,324 jobs, even accounting for adequate market adjustment time. Putting economic contributions of this magnitude at risk during a time of recession would not serve Arizona well." And this loss of revenue to the hard working taxpayers of Arizona does not take into account the cost of defending the inevitable lawsuits that will be brought against the state for civil rights and other violations. According to the IPC, "Arizona would probably face a costly slew of lawsuits on behalf of legal immigrants and native-born Latinos who feel they have been unjustly targeted" leading to millions of dollars in expenditures. http://bit.ly/dbguDK.

    As I wrote previously on this blog, SB 1070 is not the problem. It is an awful symptom of the failure of the Administration and Congress to enact immigration reform. In the void, local and state authorities have run roughshod over the civil liberties we cherish as a nation. What we see today is a perfect storm of crises�ICE's neglect and abuse of immigrant detainees which has culminated in 107 deaths in immigration detention since 2003, the serious civil rights abuses in the notorious 287(g) program which is administered by ICE and "deputizes" state and local law enforcement agencies to enforce immigration law, and an immigration bureaucracy that thumbs its nose at the needs of American business and families. As a nation we must demand that Congress and the Administration put politics aside and get to the hard work of building a safe, orderly, fair, and functional immigration policy designed to protect civil liberties and serve the needs of all Americans.

    As for today, Governor Brewer has a choice. She can succumb to hatred and fear by signing SB 1070 or allowing it to become law without her signature (it is hard to say which would be more cowardly). Or she can show uncommon political courage and veto the bill, thereby drawing a line in the Arizona desert over which racism, intolerance, and injustice dare not cross.
    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-3162775922361590244?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com


    More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2010/04/arizona-governor-jan-brewers-choice.html)





    hairstyles Megan-Fox-in-underwear.jpg hayden panettiere vs megan fox. what does hayden panettiere
  • what does hayden panettiere



  • makemygc
    04-02 09:31 PM
    Hi Desiguy786,
    I've used employer A labor to get a 7th year extension while employed with employer B but I didn't have that RFE situation. Since, you are employed with employer A currently and got an RFE, asking for H1 transfer + 1 year extension could be tricky.



    Hi Satyasaich,

    I have been working for employer A for more than 3 years and I dont know the reason for RFE, but it is related to the employer, following is the RFE, My LC is approved and applied 140 in Nov'06 which is pending. Since it's such a huge RFE ( 16 questions ), I was looking for some backup...please advice.



    In short, My RFE is asking for..
    Current number of employess: DHS records indicate that the petitioner has filed a disproportionately higher numberof H1b, and/or L-1 petitions than the number of employess shown on the petition. Submit an explanatoin for filing such an unusally high number of peitions in proportion to the low number of employees shown on you petition.

    Copies of all H and L approval notices, petitioner's organizational chart, Form 941 Quarterly wage report, Payroll Summary, Federal Income Taxes, IRS tax return filing status transcripts, lease agreement, floor plan, office photos etc..

    Consultants and Staffing Agencies: If the petitioner is, in any way , engaged in the business of consulting, employment staffing, or job placement that contracts short-term employment for workers who are traditionally self-employer, submit evidence to establish whether a specialty occupation exists for the beneficiary.

    No matter whether the alien will be working within the employment contractor's operation on projects for the client or whether the alien will work at the end-client's place of business - uscis must examine the ultimate employment of the alien, and determine whether the postion qualifies as a specialty occupation. Please clarify the petitioner's employer-employee relationship with the beneficiary and, if not already provided, submit a description of conditions of employment as provided in contractual agreements, statements of work, work orders, service agreements, or letters from authorized officials of the ultimate end-client companies where the work will actually be performed that lists the name, descritipon of the duties..etc..





    whiteStallion
    03-04 07:52 PM
    You can also expand your family .


    This is the best advice I've seen :p:p:p





    arrarrgee
    07-05 12:38 PM
    I am sure they would do that ...
    Just a thought...


    These guys are so paranoid these days that I would not be surprised if they send for bomb sniffign dogs and anti-anthrax teams when they receive several flower packages on the same day :rolleyes: :D



    No comments:

    Post a Comment