Friday, June 10, 2011

quotes about life and love

images quotes about life and love and quotes about life and love. nice quotes on life and love.
  • nice quotes on life and love.



  • satyasaich
    06-23 02:17 PM
    In case of filing for a spouse (wife or husband) and dependent children, form I-764 clearly ask to provide evidence. Atleast most recent year Tax Returns are REQUIRED as per the form. My attorney updated me to present additional 2 years of federal tax returns (not the state) as well, which are optional. Remember these are REQUIRED alongwith W2s or 1099s.





    wallpaper nice quotes on life and love. quotes about life and love. funny quotes on life and love
  • funny quotes on life and love



  • gatec77
    07-18 05:19 PM
    Since his i140 is approved he should be eligible for H1B 3 yrs extension. I think it does not matter even if has changed employer.





    quotes about life and love. quotes,life quotes,love quotes
  • quotes,life quotes,love quotes



  • jonty_11
    12-13 11:06 AM
    That is provided the dems are in pursuit of CIR.
    Pelosi never even talked abt CIR for her agenda 100 day or otherwise.....





    2011 funny quotes on life and love quotes about life and love. quotes for love and life
  • quotes for love and life



  • mita
    08-22 08:16 PM
    Enjoy your green!!!
    Got approval emails on August 14th, received approval notice by mail on August 20th, and finally got the physical green cards by mail today.:)



    more...


    quotes about life and love. funny quotes on life and love.
  • funny quotes on life and love.



  • chvs2000@yahoo.com
    08-17 10:56 AM
    Hi all , Thanks for the responses. Actually Marriage certificate and medicals were in the packet, I forgot to list it here. After going through the instructions i see my employer sent the application to a wrong address.

    Instructions say that for 140 related cases it should be sent to Nebraska or texas service center depending on where you live. Instead it has been sent to the Chicago lock box facility.

    Now when i resubmit this package to the right place do I have to include a copy of the rejection notice(I 797 C)? also every page has a line printed on it sideways along the right edge. I am not sure if resubmission means sending the rejected packet as is or prepare the forms again and send the new ones.


    In addition to checking the appropriate response in your I-485 form, you (wife)have to confirm that you are filing as a derivative of the husbands primary petition (Part 2, response should be "b" please make sure again! you may even use highlighter pen) you may include your husbands I-140 as well as Labor certification copies and highlight the Priority dates in these forms with brilliant colors.
    Marriage Certificate is a must.
    Also I would include the last years tax returns for your husband and the sealed medical clearance from your doctor, to make it rejection proof!
    A cover letter as well as a "DO NOT OPEN IN MAIL ROOM" addressing the Service center director, and placing it over a double bagged packaging of the whole thing may also help.Somehow you have to convince the morons in the mail room that it is "RESUBMISSION DUE TO USCIS ERROR"
    Wish you all the best!





    quotes about life and love. Funny Life Quotes
  • Funny Life Quotes



  • cox
    October 2nd, 2005, 07:04 PM
    What a difference a fraction of a second can make... In this case the goose subject has decided to ruin the photo for me by relieving himself in-flight... Fortunately he did not pass overhead...


    http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/887/medium/goose_canada_in-flight_poo_shoreline_C_sm100205_JP8X5431.jpg (http://javascript<b></b>:;)


    Ah, that's more like it. Taken with a 600mm f/4, 1.4x extender, and 12mm extension tube. A little more magnification, and less light... You can focus closer, but you can't focus at infinity anymore.


    http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/887/medium/goose_canada_in-flight_shoreline_C_sm_100205_JP8X5436.jpg (http://javascript<b></b>:;)

    Anyone have any experience with extension tubes they'd like to share? This is literally my first shoot with them & I had no idea what I was doing...

    Canada Geese at Shoreline Park, Mountainview, CA.



    more...


    quotes about life and love. quotes on life and love
  • quotes on life and love



  • BeCoolGuy
    04-04 07:27 AM
    https://efiling.uscis.dhs.gov/efile/ allows you to efile your applications. Not all can be efiled, but the EAD and AP can be! For sure.

    Max you can do is 180 days in advance. It is unnecessary for the most part. But won't say it is not advised. Only some folks have experienced delays in getting their EADs on time, and such events, its always to be earlier than late in filing.

    In terms of processing - and which one is better - i would assume e-file is slightly faster. Only difference is USCIS gets paid a lot faster. One may be required to do FPs in any case. It doesnt matter, if they need new fingerprints, they'll ask for it. After efiling, USCIS may still ask you to send supporting documents to their mailing address, along witha printout of the receipt of efiling. Other benefit of e-filing is, that you get your EAC (Receipt # stating that appln has been filed) right away. That is a huge benefit according to me, than anything else, for efiling. Other one is ofcourse, you dont pay to your lawyer for that processing fees.

    Goodluck.





    2010 quotes,life quotes,love quotes quotes about life and love. quotes about life and love and
  • quotes about life and love and



  • h1techSlave
    07-15 10:39 AM
    The reason for these kinds of unreasonable RFEs is simple - Improving the US economy; one RFE at a time.

    In my understanding there is no rule or guidelines regarding usage of same photos more than once. The only restriction is that the photo should not be more than 6 months old. If I remember correctly, I have used the same photos for various purposes like Visa, EAD, AP etc.

    When my AP came up for renewal my attorney asked to get new set of photos.
    In addition my cousin's EAD application got RFE'ed to get new set of photos even though the photos were recent. The reason given was that they had used same photos to renew their visa few months back (less than 6 months).
    Is USCIS coming up some new rule about photos being 'unused' ?? The guidelines say that photos should be recent (taken in last 6 months). However nowhere I do I see that the photos should be 'unused' previously ?
    Anyone else had same experience ?



    more...


    quotes about life and love. Quotes on life poems society
  • Quotes on life poems society



  • LONGGCQUE
    04-20 02:09 PM
    Contributed 25$ towards him





    hair quotes for love and life quotes about life and love. quotes on life and love.
  • quotes on life and love.



  • chanduv23
    09-17 02:10 PM
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^



    more...


    quotes about life and love. funny quotes love life.
  • funny quotes love life.



  • jsb
    11-05 03:24 PM
    Waiting for 180 days is hard....but its even harder for folks like me, who are waiting for 140 approval..The way things are, looks like it sgonna take much longer than 180 days for 140 approval...Only then I can even think of using AC21....But no complaints...Patience pays...:)

    You are not as bad as you think. Read USCIS guidance on the subject. If your I-140 is not approved by 180 days, you can still use AC21. In that case, the adjudicator while looking at your I-485, sees if filed I-140 was approvable. If so, you are good to go, provided you can prove that you have a new same/similar job offer.

    For USCIS guidance see Page 3, Q1 at: http://www.ilw.com/immigdaily/news/2005,0520-ac21.pdf





    hot funny quotes on life and love. quotes about life and love. funny quotes on life and love.
  • funny quotes on life and love.



  • mybid2003
    01-09 04:37 PM
    Similar most common agreement with most of us is that, we cannot directly or indirectly join direct/indirect client for a period of 12 months. (I don't have the agreement right in front of me). But I think you get the picture. If not, I can post in detail in the evening.

    In such case, lets say I completed my project at client A thru company A. Four months after leaving the client place (while working at Client B thru same Company A), I get the offer directly from the client A for a permanent position. (Company A still has big presence at client A. Would I be able to join Client A without any hassle? OR is it a waste of time/money to try this option?

    Also can anyone also please let me know how to if I can join higher compensation package with invoking AC21 OR transferring the H1? (I am in 8th year of my H1 and have an EAD). Can we have additional job responsibilities than what is listed in the LC?

    Pls let me know.

    Thanks in Advance!!!



    more...


    house quotes about love and life. quotes about life and love. quotes on life and love. nice
  • quotes on life and love. nice



  • beppenyc
    03-20 08:15 PM
    http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/03-20-2006/0004323801&EDATE=

    Q Okay. My question is, since 9/11, one of the key things that we need
    is immigration reform, including comprehensive immigration reform that is
    right now in front of Senator Specter's committee in the Judiciary. There are
    two principles I'm hoping that you would support: One, the good people, the
    engineers, the PhDs, the doctors, the nurses, the people in the system who
    have followed the rules, will go to the head of the line in any form of
    immigration reform. That's Title IVz of the bill.
    Secondly, the illegals who have not followed the rules -- I understand the
    debate, I appreciate your statements about immigration reform, but isn't it
    better that we know who they are, have them finger-printed and photographed,
    and allow some form of 245I to come back so --

    THE PRESIDENT: Tell people what that is. Tell people what 245I is.

    Q Okay -- 245I is a partial amnesty program that expired back in 2001,
    in fact, was going to be voted on on 9/11, unfortunately. But those -- it was
    a small segment of the illegal population where they would pay the $1,000 fine
    and, for example, coming in illegally, then marrying an American citizen,
    could somehow legalize their status.

    THE PRESIDENT: Okay. Let me give you some broad principles on
    immigration reform as I see them. First of all, we do need to know who's
    coming into our country and whether they're coming in illegally, or not
    legally -- legally or not legally -- and whether they're coming in or going
    out. And part of reforms after September the 11th was a better system of
    finding out who's coming here.
    Secondly, we have a big border between Texas and Mexico that's really hard
    to enforce. We got to do everything we can to enforce the border,
    particularly in the south. I mean, it's the place where people are pouring
    across in order to find work. We have a situation in our own neighborhood
    where there are way -- disparities are huge, and there are jobs in America
    that people won't do. That's just a fact. I met an onion grower today at the
    airport when I arrived, and he said, you got to help me find people that will
    grow onions -- pluck them, or whatever you do with them, you know.
    (Laughter.) There are jobs that just simply aren't getting done because
    Americans won't do them. And yet, if you're making 50 cents an hour in
    Mexico, and you can make a lot more in America, and you got mouths to feed,
    you're going to come and try to find the work. It's a big border, of which --
    across which people are coming to provide a living for their families.
    Step one of any immigration policy is to enforce our border in practical
    ways. We are spending additional resources to be able to use different
    detection devices, unmanned UAVs, to help -- and expand Border Patrol, by the
    way, expand the number of agents on the border, to make sure we're getting
    them the tools necessary to stop people from coming across in the first place.
    Secondly, part of the issue we've had in the past is we've had -- for lack
    of a better word -- catch and release; the Border Patrol would find people
    sneaking in; they would then hold them for a period of time; they'd say, come
    back and check in with us 45 days later, and then they wouldn't check in 45
    days later. And they would disappear in society to do the work that some
    Americans will not do.
    And so we're changing catch and release. We're particularly focusing on
    those from Central America who are coming across Mexico's southern border,
    ending up in our own -- it's a long answer, but it's an important question:
    How do we protect our borders, and at the same time, be a humane society?
    Anyway, step one, focus on enforcing border; when we find people, send
    them home, so that the work of our Border Patrol is productive work.
    Secondly, it seems like to me that part of having a border security
    program is to say to people who are hiring people here illegally, we're going
    to hold you to account. The problem is our employers don't know whether
    they're hiring people illegally because there's a whole forgery industry
    around people being smuggled into the United States. There's a smuggling
    industry and a forgery industry. And it's hard to ask our employers, the
    onion guy out there, whether or not he's got -- whether or not the documents
    that he's being shown that look real are real.
    And so here's a better proposal than what we're doing today, which is to
    say, if you're going to come to do a job an American won't do, you ought to be
    given a foolproof card that says you can come for a limited period of time and
    do work in a job an American won't do. That's border security because it
    means that people will be willing to come in legally with a card to do work on
    a limited basis, and then go home. And so the agents won't be chasing people
    being smuggled in 18-wheelers or across the Arizona desert. They'll be able
    to focus on drugs and terrorists and guns.
    The fundamental question that he is referring to is, what do we do about -
    - there's two questions -- one, should we have amnesty? And the answer, in my
    judgment, is, no, we shouldn't have amnesty. In my judgment, granting
    amnesty, automatic citizenship -- that's what amnesty means -- would cause
    another 11 million people, or however many are here, to come in the hopes of
    becoming a United States citizen. We shouldn't have amnesty. We ought to
    have a program that says, you get in line like everybody else gets in line;
    and that if the Congress feels like there needs to be higher quotas on certain
    nationalities, raise the quotas. But don't let people get in front of the
    line for somebody who has been playing by the rules. (Applause.)
    And so, anyway, that's my ideas on good immigration policy. Obviously,
    there's going to be some questions we have to answer: What about the person
    who's been here since 1987 -- '86 was the last attempt at coming up with
    immigration reform -- been here for a long period of time. They've raised a
    family here. And my only advice for the Congress and for people in the debate
    is understand what made America. We're a land of immigrants. This guy is
    from Hungary, you know. (Applause.) And we got to treat people fairly.
    We've got to have a system of law that is respectful for people.
    I mean, the idea of having a program that causes people to get stuck in
    the back of 18-wheelers, to risk their lives to sneak into America to do work
    that some people won't do is just not American, in my judgment. And so I
    would hope the debate would be civil and uphold the honor of this country.
    And remember, we've been through these periods before, where the immigration
    debate can get harsh. And it should not be harsh. And I hope -- my call for
    people is to be rational about the debate and thoughtful about what words can
    mean during this debate.
    Final question, sir. You're paying me a lot of money and I got to go back
    to work. (Laughter.)



    PS I did not know about the story of I-245 on 9/11....





    tattoo Funny Life Quotes quotes about life and love. funny quotes on life and love
  • funny quotes on life and love



  • rajeshalex
    09-25 02:07 PM
    try work from home jobs. Since you have filed 485 there wont be any out of status issue. If your 140 is approved and EAD is valid you can work full time /part time or sit without any work.



    more...


    pictures quotes on life and love quotes about life and love. good quotes about life and
  • good quotes about life and



  • meridiani.planum
    10-19 08:46 PM
    Dear Friends, my 140 just got approved at TSC (EB3-India, PD Feb 03, 140/485 filed in July 07). Given the current economic turmoil, my company may lay off people. I have a valid EAD till Oct 09. God forbid, if I can't find another job here after my layoff, is it legal to go to my home country (i.e., India) for a few months and then come back before Oct 09 to renew my EAD? Assuming the USCIS doesn't adjudicate my 485 while I'm away, could I have any problems at the port of entry (since I would be using Advance Parole but wouldn't have a job)?

    Thanks.

    GG_007

    if you go back to your home country without a job, and you get an RFE for an employment verification letter, how are you going to respond to that?
    Also note that earlier most RFEs had a response time of 12 weeks, starting from a few months ago the IO has the discretion to choose the response time. So for something like an EVL (which he would assume you can provide within a few days) you might only have a response time of 4 weeks... Also, its not necesasry that you get the RFE only when your PD is current, USCIS is continuing to process cases, and you can get an RFE even if your date is not current...

    As some posters have mentioned, travel on AP has also troublesome for some people. No one that I know of has been denied entry, but IOs at some port-of-entries have insisted that travel on AP should be only for emergencies. Again, its just harassment due to unclear policies, no one that I know of has been denied entry.





    dresses funny quotes on life and love. quotes about life and love. touching quotes on life and
  • touching quotes on life and



  • mrane1
    07-18 04:23 PM
    Wow!! never heard of such a thing!!



    more...


    makeup Quotes on life poems society quotes about life and love. quotes about love and life.
  • quotes about love and life.



  • gc_nebraska
    01-08 02:22 PM
    Thanks for the info Ram Nara , so on your passport you just have the B1 stamped ?Did they question you at port of entry? Any documents?





    girlfriend funny quotes on life and love quotes about life and love. quotes about life and love
  • quotes about life and love



  • rockstart
    07-02 03:17 PM
    Have you seen any 2008 case getting approved before 2007.

    Guys,

    I want to sue them for 3 things -

    1) Touching I-140 cases way outside processing times (eg. 2008 when the date is July, 2007)
    2) Approving 2008 cases before 2007, ie., no FIFO
    3) Discrimination against EB3 cases during I-140 stage. I-140 case processing should be independent of Eb category, I have not read any rule where it should be.

    Any idea how to start this process of accountability and justice. After 10 yrs., >$15k invested in a black hole, dealing with **** employers in a fragile economy, but mainly precious time which can never be recovered - I have HAD ENOUGH!!





    hairstyles funny quotes love life. quotes about life and love. quotes about life and love
  • quotes about life and love



  • MunnaBhai
    03-14 03:06 PM
    I agree. Most of these companies openly misuse L1 visas. I have seen myself, how L1 guys from Infosys, TCS, and IBM India working at client sites.





    chi_shark
    12-02 11:51 PM
    thanks! i do have business activities... and i am not worried about audits...


    If you are independent contractor you can take some allowed expenses. If you are salaried employee you need to show loss for getting some benefit. Generally if you show loss for 3 years continously then IRS mostly deny on third year. In any case if you take too much expense you are inviting audit and that is going to be nightmare. I do not think it is a good idea to start a company just for expenses unless you are going to do business. Atleast you should be doing independent contracting(corp to Corp).





    the_jaguar
    10-19 09:16 PM
    Hi Rajenk:

    I have gone through the link that you have posted here. Thank you so much. It is very informative.

    The only question i have is, my employer though a bank, is not willing to give me a copy of my I140 WHATSOEVER. I tried numerous times and they only say that the attorney (FRAGOMEN) has advised not to give the copy of I140 to the beneficiary. With the banks you know..they may be around or shut any time.

    Can you please advise, COPY OF I140 IS REQUIRED, for porting the priority date to new employer?

    Thanks

    You can file a FOIA request to get a copy of your approved I-140. There are other folks in this forum who have done that successfully.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment